logologo_light
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action

The EPA Comes to West Virginia – to Listen

Via The Charleston Gazette-Mail:

It’s taken a while — several years in fact — but the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has finally come to West Virginia to hear testimony about the Clean Power Plan.

There was plenty of pent-up demand to be heard. As many as 200 people testified Tuesday and Wednesday at the state Capitol.

The EPA under the Obama administration created the Clean Power Plan as a broad stroke against global warming. The rules set impossibly low carbon emission standards for power plants to force the coal industry out of business, while driving up electricity costs.

The EPA’s hostility toward coal through the Clean Power Plan and other enforcement measures severely damaged the coal industry. Miners lost their jobs and coal companies went bankrupt. Hundreds of mine supply companies lost business. Good jobs and tax revenue disappeared.

Coal was also hit hard by market forces, such as plentiful and low-cost natural gas and an increasing desire by the public to use more renewables. However, it’s undeniable that having a government agency target an industry for elimination is pretty bad for business.

The EPA under the Trump administration is reversing course, and the hearings in Charleston this week are evidence of that. The EPA is now rolling back the Clean Power Plan, but there is a process for that which includes field hearings.

EPA Region III Administrator Cosmo Servidio told reporters Tuesday President Barack Obama’s EPA went beyond its authority when it tried to impose the draconian carbon standards.

“Clearly the Clean Power Plan was an overreach by the previous administration, and this is an opportunity for us to get some feedback as we move forward,” he told reporters. “It’s important that we’re here in West Virginia, coal country. Obviously the coal industry was going to feel the biggest effects of the Clean Power Plan.”

And that’s why the previous administration’s EPA never bothered to come here. The agency knew its argument in support of a rule that would have no discernible impact on global temperatures would not wash with coal miners worried about losing their livelihood.

Obama’s EPA also knew it was on shaky legal footing. Its exploitation of a few words of the Clean Air Act to remake the nation’s energy economy was a clear abuse of its power.

Notably, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay on the Clean Power Plan, a legal decision normally made when the challenging side has a reasonable chance of success when the merits of the case are argued.

The previous administration’s EPA shut out West Virginia. Even veteran lawmakers like former Congressman Nick Rahall, who always had a working relationship with the agency, was stiff-armed. The anguished voices from suffering coal communities fell on deaf ears.

But this week those voices were finally heard.

See the article here.

  • On December 1, 2017
Recent Coal in the News Posts
  • The EPA’s plan to break the electricity grid
  • No Energy Transition Without a Reliable Electric Power Grid
  • America faces chronic electricity shortages in push for renewable energy
  • The latest Biden energy crisis
  • Capito, Miller Introduce Bill to Block Implementation of EPA’s Power Plant Proposals
  • Opinion: Looming power shortages highlight flawed policy
  • Experts Warn of Grid Crisis as PA Senators Demand Green Energy
Popular Posts
  • Be part of the revolutionApril 14, 2015
  • Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”August 14, 2015
  • NMA Calls EPA’s Power Plant Rule a Reckless Gamble with the EconomyJanuary 7, 2014
Recent Comments
  • Clean Power Plan Facing Opposition in Missouri | Count on Coal on Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”
  • Death of a Shalesman: U.S. Energy Independence Is a Fairy Tale | SuddenlySlimmer on Voices
Tags
affordability baseload power Bloomberg California carbon capture utilization and storage China coal Department of Energy (DOE) electricity grid electricity prices Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) emissions energy addition energy transition Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Europe Fatih Birol Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fuel diversity Germany grid reliability infrastructure International Energy Agency (IEA) James Danly Jim Robb Joe Biden Mark Christie Michael Regan Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) National Mining Association (NMA) natural gas New England North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) PJM Interconnection polling renewable energy Rich Nolan Southwest Power Pool (SPP) technology Texas transmission lines U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) United Kingdom Wall Street Journal wind power

Sierra Club Pressed EPA to Create Impossible Coal Standards

Scroll
Count on Coal
Recent Posts
  • Strengthening Energy Security: DPA Action Reinforces America’s Coal Advantage
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
RECENT TWEETS
Tweets by @countoncoal
Privacy Policy | © Copyright Count on Coal 2024