logologo_light
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action

Speakers Decry ‘Heavy Hand of Regulation’ at BLM Coal Meeting

Via The Wyoming Business Report: 

The first of six public meetings hosted by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management on its recent environmental assessment of the federal coal program took place in Casper today, with the many speakers criticizing federal regulations they say have helped push the coal industry into disarray, as prices have plummeted and bankruptcies and layoffs soared over the past few years.

Much of the coal mined in the U.S. — and the vast majority mined in Wyoming — comes from federally owned land, much of it controlled by the BLM. The assessment includes what could be a three-year moratorium on new public coal leases, as the Obama Administration moves ahead in its measures to combat climate change.

The meeting to gather the opinions of the public was held at the Casper Events Center with a couple hundred interested citizens in attendance. Reasonably tight security marked the session, as people’s bags were inspected and coats opened to check for firearms.

The session opened with a PowerPoint presentation by the BLM that outlined the government’s coal leasing and management program Mary Jo Rugwell, the BLM’s Wyoming state director, welcomed attendees before calling on U.S. Sen. Mike Enzi for opening remarks. The Republican, who once served as mayor of Gillette — ground zero for Wyoming’s coal bust — noted that he was involved in originally helping to set up the federal coal leasing program back in the 1970s. He asked the BLM to schedule a scoping meeting in Gillette, where the impacts — pro and con — of the federal coal management program are most deeply experienced.

“More than 40 percent of the sales price of federal coal in Wyoming goes to taxes and fees,” Enzi said. “These meetings will give the administration a better understanding of how much Wyoming appreciates coal.”

Tucker Fagan, Wyoming state director for Rep. Cynthia Lummis, also spoke about the coal program and was sharply critical of the administration for declaring the moratorium on new leasing.

State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jillian Balow also spoke, saying she was raised in the Gillette area and is sympathetic to the embattled industry.

“We need to lift the heavy hand of regulation that comes down every day,” Balow said. “More than $3.2 billion of coal receipts have gone into new school construction and remodeling.”

Several dozen members of the public registered to give three-minute’s worth of comments for the record.

Some of the event’s early speakers were from environmental organizations such as the Sierra Club, Wilderness Society and Powder River Basin Resource Council.

One rancher’s comments were read by a friend, since his cattle were calving and he was tied up. His remarks illustrated the long-standing conflict between privately-owned surface and Federal sub-surface interests. His grazing lands were taken over by mining operations and he had to go as far as South Dakota to find pastures.

Several speakers also noted that there’s a 20-year supply of coal already under lease and there shouldn’t be a hurry to lease more Federal coal.

Mining company representatives, “Friends of Coal” representatives and candidates for various state offices also spoke, mostly against the moratorium and the time-consuming and very costly process of preparing the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement.

Written comments on the EIS need to be submitted to the BLM by July 28. The public scoping sessions will end in Pittsburgh at the end of June.

See the article here.

  • On May 17, 2016
Recent Coal in the News Posts
  • The EPA’s plan to break the electricity grid
  • No Energy Transition Without a Reliable Electric Power Grid
  • America faces chronic electricity shortages in push for renewable energy
  • The latest Biden energy crisis
  • Capito, Miller Introduce Bill to Block Implementation of EPA’s Power Plant Proposals
  • Opinion: Looming power shortages highlight flawed policy
  • Experts Warn of Grid Crisis as PA Senators Demand Green Energy
Popular Posts
  • Be part of the revolutionApril 14, 2015
  • Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”August 14, 2015
  • NMA Calls EPA’s Power Plant Rule a Reckless Gamble with the EconomyJanuary 7, 2014
Recent Comments
  • Clean Power Plan Facing Opposition in Missouri | Count on Coal on Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”
  • Death of a Shalesman: U.S. Energy Independence Is a Fairy Tale | SuddenlySlimmer on Voices
Tags
affordability baseload power Bloomberg California carbon capture utilization and storage China coal Department of Energy (DOE) electricity grid electricity prices Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) emissions energy addition energy transition Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Europe Fatih Birol Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fuel diversity Germany grid reliability infrastructure International Energy Agency (IEA) James Danly Jim Robb Joe Biden Mark Christie Michael Regan Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) National Mining Association (NMA) natural gas New England North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) PJM Interconnection polling renewable energy Rich Nolan Southwest Power Pool (SPP) technology Texas transmission lines U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) United Kingdom Wall Street Journal wind power

Sierra Club Pressed EPA to Create Impossible Coal Standards

Scroll
Count on Coal
Recent Posts
  • Strengthening Energy Security: DPA Action Reinforces America’s Coal Advantage
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
RECENT TWEETS
Tweets by @countoncoal
Privacy Policy | © Copyright Count on Coal 2024