logologo_light
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action

Ratepayer Protection Act: Welcomed Move by U.S. House

Via The Bluefield Daily Telegraph:

The passage last week of the Ratepayer Protection Act in the U.S. House of Representatives is another welcomed step in the ongoing efforts by the new Republican majority in Washington — with help from some Democrats — to stop the crippling war on coal that the Obama administration has been waging on our region for the past six years.

The measure, which was jointly co-sponsored locally by U.S. Rep. Evan Jenkins, R-W.Va., and U.S. Rep. Morgan Griffith, R-Va., would allow for the judicial system to review any final rule in the Environmental Protection Agency’s controversial Clean Power Plan — a measure that has already led to the closure of coal-fired power plants across West Virginia and Virginia — before states are required to comply with its implementation if the state’s governor has determined it would significantly harm energy reliability or affordability.

 “We all know that the EPA’s proposed coal-fired power plant regulations have and would put West Virginia coal miners out of work and raise the cost of electricity for West Virginia’s families and small businesses,” Jenkins said last week. “By passing the Ratepayer Protection Act, we’re giving power to the states instead of the federal government, allowing them to make decisions in the best interests of their states and residents. We must ensure that West Virginia has abundant electricity production at affordable rates, and West Virginia coal provides jobs and affordable domestic energy.”

“I believe that this administration’s so-called ‘Clean Power Plan’ is not only expensive, burdensome, and unreasonable, but that based on the law and prior court opinions, the Environmental Protection Agency does not have the authority to enact it under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act.,” Griffith, who represents Virginia’s so-called Fightin’ Ninth Congressional District, added. “Accordingly, the courts ought to weigh in on the plan’s legality before states implement it, and before those who pay an electric bill are required to spend a significant amount of money. House passage of the Ratepayer Protection Act is an important step in seeing that states can retain control of their energy markets, and that ratepayers don’t have to pay for a frivolous regulation EPA knows or ought to know it does not have the authority to implement.”

Jenkins an Griffith joined Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., Rep. Sanford Bishop, D-Ga., and Rep. Collin Peterson, D-Minn., in introducing the Ratepayer Protection Act, which has earned the support of the United Mine Workers of America.

The measure is another necessary step in the fight to protect the coalfields of West Virginia and Virginia. We believe it is critical for lawmakers in both the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate to continue the fight before even more harm is done to both states, and the coalfield communities in particular.

As electric rates across our nation continue to increase due to these controversial new rules, more Americans will begin to feel the pain of Washington’s war on coal. And perhaps a few more eyes will be opened in the process.

See the article here.

  • On June 30, 2015
Recent Coal in the News Posts
  • The EPA’s plan to break the electricity grid
  • No Energy Transition Without a Reliable Electric Power Grid
  • America faces chronic electricity shortages in push for renewable energy
  • The latest Biden energy crisis
  • Capito, Miller Introduce Bill to Block Implementation of EPA’s Power Plant Proposals
  • Opinion: Looming power shortages highlight flawed policy
  • Experts Warn of Grid Crisis as PA Senators Demand Green Energy
Popular Posts
  • Be part of the revolutionApril 14, 2015
  • Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”August 14, 2015
  • NMA Calls EPA’s Power Plant Rule a Reckless Gamble with the EconomyJanuary 7, 2014
Recent Comments
  • Clean Power Plan Facing Opposition in Missouri | Count on Coal on Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”
  • Death of a Shalesman: U.S. Energy Independence Is a Fairy Tale | SuddenlySlimmer on Voices
Tags
affordability baseload power Bloomberg California carbon capture utilization and storage China coal Department of Energy (DOE) electricity grid electricity prices Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) emissions energy addition energy transition Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Europe Fatih Birol Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fuel diversity Germany grid reliability infrastructure International Energy Agency (IEA) James Danly Jim Robb Joe Biden Mark Christie Michael Regan Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) National Mining Association (NMA) natural gas New England North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) PJM Interconnection polling renewable energy Rich Nolan Southwest Power Pool (SPP) technology Texas transmission lines U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) United Kingdom Wall Street Journal wind power

Sierra Club Pressed EPA to Create Impossible Coal Standards

Scroll
Count on Coal
Recent Posts
  • Strengthening Energy Security: DPA Action Reinforces America’s Coal Advantage
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
RECENT TWEETS
Tweets by @countoncoal
Privacy Policy | © Copyright Count on Coal 2024