logologo_light
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action

‘Scrubbers’ Muddy Claim of ‘Dirty Coal’

Via OneNewsNow.com: 

One of the biggest arguments against the coal industry involves how “dirty” coal is but one critic of that argument calls it a myth.

Sierra Club is one of the biggest critics of the coal industry, saying it contributes to everything from climate disruption – or climate change – to toxic water pollution and asthma. As a result, the club’s Beyond Coal campaign has a countdown for the number of coal-burning power plants the Sierra Club wants to see retired.

On the other side of the argument is Terry Jarrett, attorney and former Missouri Public Service commissioner. He says the “myth” of dirty coal is, in fact, just a myth.

“We can all harken back to 30, 40 years ago,” he says, “with the old-fashioned coal plants, so to speak, which were belching out a lot of smoke out of their smokestacks. And that is sort of what the green industry continues to try to portray coal as being.”

But that is no longer true today, he insists, calling today’s plants “very, very clean.”

Sierra Club and like-minded entities may beg to differ but Jarrett says modern coal plants have lots of clean coal technologies.

“Technologies that scrub all kinds of pollutants and emissions out of the coal,” he says, “before it goes up the smokestack.”

Information found on the Department of Energy’s website states the following:

Most modern power plants — and all plants built after 1978 — are required to have special devices installed that clean the sulfur from the coal’s combustion gases before the gases go up the smokestack. The technical name for these devices is “flue gas desulfurization units,” but most people just call them “scrubbers” — because they “scrub” the sulfur out of the smoke released by coal-burning boilers.

Today’s coal plants also scrub emissions of particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and mercury, Jarrett adds. As a result, he says, the nation can continue to use coal, whereas Sierra Club wants alternative energy sources that supporters claim are more environmentally friendly.

In the meantime, coal was at the top of the list last year for sources of electricity generation in the U.S.

See the article here.

  • On April 19, 2016
Recent Coal in the News Posts
  • The EPA’s plan to break the electricity grid
  • No Energy Transition Without a Reliable Electric Power Grid
  • America faces chronic electricity shortages in push for renewable energy
  • The latest Biden energy crisis
  • Capito, Miller Introduce Bill to Block Implementation of EPA’s Power Plant Proposals
  • Opinion: Looming power shortages highlight flawed policy
  • Experts Warn of Grid Crisis as PA Senators Demand Green Energy
Popular Posts
  • Be part of the revolutionApril 14, 2015
  • Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”August 14, 2015
  • NMA Calls EPA’s Power Plant Rule a Reckless Gamble with the EconomyJanuary 7, 2014
Recent Comments
  • Clean Power Plan Facing Opposition in Missouri | Count on Coal on Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”
  • Death of a Shalesman: U.S. Energy Independence Is a Fairy Tale | SuddenlySlimmer on Voices
Tags
affordability baseload power Bloomberg California carbon capture utilization and storage China coal Department of Energy (DOE) electricity grid electricity prices Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) emissions energy addition energy transition Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Europe Fatih Birol Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fuel diversity Germany grid reliability infrastructure International Energy Agency (IEA) James Danly Jim Robb Joe Biden Mark Christie Michael Regan Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) National Mining Association (NMA) natural gas New England North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) PJM Interconnection polling renewable energy Rich Nolan Southwest Power Pool (SPP) technology Texas transmission lines U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) United Kingdom Wall Street Journal wind power

Sierra Club Pressed EPA to Create Impossible Coal Standards

Scroll
Count on Coal
Recent Posts
  • Strengthening Energy Security: DPA Action Reinforces America’s Coal Advantage
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
RECENT TWEETS
Tweets by @countoncoal
Privacy Policy | © Copyright Count on Coal 2024