logologo_light
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action

Former Obama DOE Official Set to Critique ‘Stupid Regulations’

Via E&E Publishing: 

A former Obama administration official plans this week to tell lawmakers that the Clean Power Plan is “ideological mumbo jumbo” and that the government would be better off investing more money into clean energy and fossil fuel technologies.

Charles McConnell, who was responsible for the Department of Energy’s fossil fuels program, will testify Thursday in front of the House Science, Space and Technology Subcommittee on Environment.

He’ll appear alongside Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt (R), who is challenging the Clean Power Plan in court, and Constitutional Accountability Center Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod, who represents more than 200 lawmakers who are in favor of the program.

McConnell served for two years as assistant secretary of energy at DOE before joining Rice University in August 2013, where he serves as executive director of its Energy and Environment Initiative. He’s worked nearly 40 years on energy issues, formerly serving as vice president of carbon management at Battelle Energy Technology and as an executive of Praxair Inc.

At DOE, McConnell oversaw the budgets and policy strategy of programs in oil, natural gas, coal and advanced technologies.

In an interview Friday previewing his testimony, McConnell said he will tell the panel, which is chaired by a climate change doubter, Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-Okla.), that he believes in man-made climate change and climate regulations.

But, McConnell said, U.S. EPA’s program for cutting carbon dioxide emissions from power plants would not measurably address global warming and the Obama administration is “disingenuous” for making it the cornerstone of its environmental agenda.

“I’m going to come right out of the box very quickly by not denying climate change. I believe that the climate’s changing,” McConnell said. “I think it’s fundamentally important to look at carbon dioxide as a forcing function of climate change.

“Those two things being said,” he continued, “and the fact that I believe CO2 regulation is important, my punctuation mark is this Clean Power Plan does not relevantly or impactfully affect global CO2 emissions.”

While EPA has acknowledged that the Clean Power Plan itself won’t have a big impact on global climate change, the agency has promoted it as part of a larger strategy and key to getting nations on board with the Paris climate agreement.

Along with furnishing a chart showing the Clean Power Plan’s small impact on global greenhouse gas emissions, McConnell also plans to testify that the Clean Power Plan is illegal and an abuse of EPA’s authority.

The former Obama administration official told E&E Daily that EPA has wandered into the territory of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, state utility commissions and other state regulators.

EPA, he alleged, is trying to force a federal renewable fuel standard onto the country and is pushing wind and solar energy to the detriment of research on fossil fuel technologies such as carbon capture, utilization and storage.

“I’m not against climate regulations, nor am I against being concerned about the environment, but I am against stupid regulations,” he said. “And I’m against an administration that would call for an all-of-the-above strategy and not put their money where their mouth is.”

The United States, he said, should seek to lead “the Chinas and Indias of the world” in researching and advancing technologies to make burning fossil fuels cleaner.

At DOE, McConnell said, he was disappointed at the lack of coordination between the department and EPA on energy technologies. He said he sensed a disconnect between EPA’s vision for regulations and the ability of technologies to achieve climate goals.

“EPA seems to be relying on the technology fairy to come in and sprinkle dust over this stuff and have it perform the way they want it to,” he said.

‘Lawful exercise’

The hearing comes as the Clean Power Plan remains frozen by the Supreme Court until the resolution of complex litigation. Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unexpectedly delayed arguments in the case until September before the full court instead of the typical three-judge panel (Greenwire, May 17).

Gorod of the Constitutional Accountability Center plans to defend the Clean Power Plan’s legality at the hearing. She is representing 208 current and former members of Congress from 38 states — mostly Democrats — who last month filed a “friend of the court” brief in support of EPA’s authority to issue the plan (Greenwire, April 1).

“I’ll explain that the Clean Power Plan is a lawful exercise of the discretion that Congress conferred on EPA when it enacted and substantially amended the Clean Air Act,” she said in an interview Friday.

The Constitutional Accountability Center promotes a progressive reading of the Constitution and has previously represented lawmakers in litigation over President Obama’s health care plan. Gorod will be the Democratic minority’s witness at the hearing.

She said her testimony will also focus on the state authority under the Clean Power Plan.

“This idea that the Clean Power Plan somehow intrudes on state authority,” Gorod said, “I think it’s very clear when you actually look at the rule, when you look at the Clean Power Plan, it actually accords states due respect.”

Schedule: The hearing is Thursday, May 26, at 9:30 a.m. in 2318 Rayburn.

Witnesses: Scott Pruitt, attorney general of Oklahoma; Brianne Gorod, chief counsel of the Constitutional Accountability Center; and Charles McConnell, executive director of Rice University’s Energy and Environment Initiative.

See the article here.

  • On May 24, 2016
Recent Coal in the News Posts
  • The EPA’s plan to break the electricity grid
  • No Energy Transition Without a Reliable Electric Power Grid
  • America faces chronic electricity shortages in push for renewable energy
  • The latest Biden energy crisis
  • Capito, Miller Introduce Bill to Block Implementation of EPA’s Power Plant Proposals
  • Opinion: Looming power shortages highlight flawed policy
  • Experts Warn of Grid Crisis as PA Senators Demand Green Energy
Popular Posts
  • Be part of the revolutionApril 14, 2015
  • Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”August 14, 2015
  • NMA Calls EPA’s Power Plant Rule a Reckless Gamble with the EconomyJanuary 7, 2014
Recent Comments
  • Clean Power Plan Facing Opposition in Missouri | Count on Coal on Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”
  • Death of a Shalesman: U.S. Energy Independence Is a Fairy Tale | SuddenlySlimmer on Voices
Tags
affordability baseload power Bloomberg California carbon capture utilization and storage China coal Department of Energy (DOE) electricity grid electricity prices Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) emissions energy addition energy transition Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Europe Fatih Birol Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fuel diversity Germany grid reliability infrastructure International Energy Agency (IEA) James Danly Jim Robb Joe Biden Mark Christie Michael Regan Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) National Mining Association (NMA) natural gas New England North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) PJM Interconnection polling renewable energy Rich Nolan Southwest Power Pool (SPP) technology Texas transmission lines U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) United Kingdom Wall Street Journal wind power

Sierra Club Pressed EPA to Create Impossible Coal Standards

Scroll
Count on Coal
Recent Posts
  • Strengthening Energy Security: DPA Action Reinforces America’s Coal Advantage
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
RECENT TWEETS
Tweets by @countoncoal
Privacy Policy | © Copyright Count on Coal 2024