logologo_light
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action

Weathering the Storms

September 12, 2017

Nature has rudely interrupted a static Beltway debate about grid reliability and the need for baseload power.

The series of powerful storms swept through sprawling cities and Caribbean villages, annihilating every structure in their path. For hundreds of thousands of people impoverished by nature’s fury is now added the lack of electricity. For at least days and possibly weeks until power is restored, they will know what life is like for the world’s 1.3 billion “energy poor” for whom reliable electricity remains an impossible luxury.

For many everyday Americans, nature’s fury brings into sharp focus the practical question of what can be done to secure grid resilience. Some 6 million households in Florida alone are without power, said the state’s disaster agency, and restoration must be measured “in weeks, not days.” That’s a timely reminder of the grid’s fragility and the importance of using all energy sources.

Americans seem to agree. Eighty-five percent believe the U.S. should be doing more to diversify its energy grid to increase the resilience of our domestic energy market, and minimize potential impacts from disasters such as the recent storms, according to a poll conducted over the weekend by Morning Consult for NMA.

Those questioning the validity of “disruptive events” as a justification for baseload power now know what such events look like. Pipelines were destroyed, power plants shut down and outages that will last for weeks. The only reason power outages were not more disruptive is because massive evacuations left fewer households to overload the grid.

The point is, destructive events aren’t unicorns. Yesterday’s polar vortex is today’s Harvey and Irma. To weather them, we’ll need the pillars of baseload power, including coal. A recent report for the American Council for Clean Coal Electricity points out that coal plants have on average 73-day supply of fuel on site. No need for pipelines that are highly vulnerable to supply disruptions “especially when low-probability, high-impacts events occur,” said the ACCCE report.

In the age of Instagram and self-driving EVs, we still can’t avoid the merciless power of nature. We can only minimize the risks.

  • On September 12, 2017
Recent Blog Posts
  • Strengthening Energy Security: DPA Action Reinforces America’s Coal Advantage
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
  • New U.S. Coal Capacity is Coming
  • Another Global Pivot to Coal?
Popular Posts
  • Be part of the revolutionApril 14, 2015
  • Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”August 14, 2015
  • NMA Calls EPA’s Power Plant Rule a Reckless Gamble with the EconomyJanuary 7, 2014
Recent Comments
  • Clean Power Plan Facing Opposition in Missouri | Count on Coal on Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”
  • Death of a Shalesman: U.S. Energy Independence Is a Fairy Tale | SuddenlySlimmer on Voices
Tags
affordability baseload power Bloomberg California carbon capture utilization and storage China coal Department of Energy (DOE) electricity grid electricity prices Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) emissions energy addition energy transition Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Europe Fatih Birol Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fuel diversity Germany grid reliability infrastructure International Energy Agency (IEA) James Danly Jim Robb Joe Biden Mark Christie Michael Regan Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) National Mining Association (NMA) natural gas New England North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) PJM Interconnection polling renewable energy Rich Nolan Southwest Power Pool (SPP) technology Texas transmission lines U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) United Kingdom Wall Street Journal wind power

Sierra Club Pressed EPA to Create Impossible Coal Standards

Scroll
Count on Coal
Recent Posts
  • Strengthening Energy Security: DPA Action Reinforces America’s Coal Advantage
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
RECENT TWEETS
Tweets by @countoncoal
Privacy Policy | © Copyright Count on Coal 2024