logologo_light
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action
  • News
  • Blog
  • States
  • Resources
  • Videos
  • About Us
  • Take Action

Letter: EPA is Hindering Cleaner Coal

Via The Courier & Press:

The editorial titled No Such Thing as Clean Coal (Oct. 13) paints a doomsday outlook for coal as an energy source and for human health.

However, technology has significantly reduced emissions from coal-fired power plants – up to 90 percent in the past few decades. Other technologies can further reductions – if they were allowed to be implemented.

Unfortunately, the EPA’s Clean Power Plan sets carbon-dioxide reduction levels for new power plants at unattainable levels. These regulations will have little if any effect on global temperatures or sea levels because developing nations continue to use vast amounts of coal.

Yet these regulations – if federal court fails to step in – will cease further development of coal technologies. Meaning there will be no new coal-fueled power plants built in the United States, and advancements in cleaner-coal technologies will become part of the past, not our future.

The editorial is also off base when it comes to recovery and low cost natural gas as the reason for the significant decrease in coal production. While that is true for select parts of the country, including the Baltimore area where this editorial first appeared, states like Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia sit atop huge natural-gas reserves that have recently become productive due to hydraulic fracturing.

But what may be good for Baltimore is not so good for Evansville. Indiana doesn’t have the same shale units that exist in select other states, and the shale units we do have don’t produce high natural gas output.

Indiana produces very little in the way of natural gas, and the phrase “cheap natural gas” is the real oxymoron for Indiana. Natural gas costs 57 percent more today than it did six months ago. Utilities are announcing that ratepayers should expect higher bills this winter due to increased natural gas costs. This should give us all a reality check on the historic volatility of natural gas.

Yet coal remains at a steady price, and provides about 80 percent of Indiana’s electric generation because it’s affordable, reliable, and abundant – and right within our own borders.

Switching to out-of-state natural gas will increase electric bills, eliminate Hoosier jobs, reduce contributions to the Hoosier tax base, and send our hard-earned money to those states with large natural gas reserves.

The EPA prefers we sacrifice our own communities to lead the rest of the world in carbon-dioxide reduction. A better approach would be to put faith in scientists and engineers at our leading institutions, and continue to develop cleaner, emission-reducing technologies that benefit our nation and our Hoosier communities – rather than pinning our hopes on leaders halfway around the globe.

Bruce Stevens is President of the Indiana Coal Council.

See the article here.

  • On October 14, 2016
Recent Coal in the News Posts
  • The EPA’s plan to break the electricity grid
  • No Energy Transition Without a Reliable Electric Power Grid
  • America faces chronic electricity shortages in push for renewable energy
  • The latest Biden energy crisis
  • Capito, Miller Introduce Bill to Block Implementation of EPA’s Power Plant Proposals
  • Opinion: Looming power shortages highlight flawed policy
  • Experts Warn of Grid Crisis as PA Senators Demand Green Energy
Popular Posts
  • Be part of the revolutionApril 14, 2015
  • Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”August 14, 2015
  • NMA Calls EPA’s Power Plant Rule a Reckless Gamble with the EconomyJanuary 7, 2014
Recent Comments
  • Clean Power Plan Facing Opposition in Missouri | Count on Coal on Missouri Should Oppose Obama’s “Clean Power Plan”
  • Death of a Shalesman: U.S. Energy Independence Is a Fairy Tale | SuddenlySlimmer on Voices
Tags
affordability baseload power Bloomberg California carbon capture utilization and storage China coal Department of Energy (DOE) electricity grid electricity prices Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) emissions energy addition energy transition Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Europe Fatih Birol Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fuel diversity Germany grid reliability infrastructure International Energy Agency (IEA) James Danly Jim Robb Joe Biden Mark Christie Michael Regan Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) National Mining Association (NMA) natural gas New England North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) PJM Interconnection polling renewable energy Rich Nolan Southwest Power Pool (SPP) technology Texas transmission lines U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) United Kingdom Wall Street Journal wind power

Sierra Club Pressed EPA to Create Impossible Coal Standards

Scroll
Count on Coal
Recent Posts
  • Strengthening Energy Security: DPA Action Reinforces America’s Coal Advantage
  • PJM’s Power Crunch: Why Coal Is Critical to Closing a 60-Gigawatt Gap
  • China’s Coal Playbook Is Winning
  • Today’s Gas Glut, Tomorrow’s Price Shock
  • The Global Pivot to Coal Is About More Than Electricity
RECENT TWEETS
Tweets by @countoncoal
Privacy Policy | © Copyright Count on Coal 2024